Novità nel mondo di Medicina di Laboratorio
Alnylam's Rare Genetic Disorder Drug Priced at $575,000 Per Year
Reuters Health Information
Risk-Adapted Starting Ages Suggested for Breast Cancer Screening
Reuters Health Information
Clinical Decision Rules for Evaluating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Underused
Reuters Health Information
Flu Season Is Here Early, Hitting Older Adults, Young Kids: CDC
Medscape Medical News
No Link Between Statins and Cognitive Decline
Medscape Medical News
The Week That Wasn't: Keto and the Flu, Human Cyborg, Duvet Disease
Medscape
Peripheral Fields Key in Predicting Diabetic Retinopathy
Medscape Medical News
Effect of Vitamin D and Omega-3 Supplements on Systemic Inflammation [Editorials]
Answering Unanswerable Questions in the Clinical Laboratory with Data Warehouses [Editorials]
Procalcitonin's Adjunct Role in the Diagnosis and Management of Pneumonia [Editorials]
Population-Specific Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [Editorials]
Laboratory Measurement's Contribution to the Replication and Application Crisis in Clinical Research [Editorials]
Dried Blood Spots May Improve Detection of Blood Doping [Editorials]
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing and Detection of Occult Maternal Malignancies [Perspective]
Perspectives on the Changing Landscape of Measuring Cardiovascular Risk Related to LDL [Q&A]
Persistent Jaundice and Multiple Fractures in a Newborn [Clinical Case Study]
Ethics for Laboratory Medicine [Review]
Laboratory medicine, like other areas of medicine, is obliged to adhere to high ethical standards. There are particular ethical issues that are unique to laboratory medicine and other areas in which ethical issues uniquely impact laboratory practice. Despite this, there is variability in ethics education within the profession. This review provides a foundation for the study of ethics within laboratory medicine.
CONTENT:The Belmont Report identifies 3 core principles in biomedical ethics: respect for persons (including autonomy), beneficence (and its corollary nonmalfeasance), and justice. These core principles must be adhered to in laboratory medicine. Informed consent is vital to maintain patient autonomy. However, balancing patient autonomy with the desire for beneficence can sometimes be difficult when patients refuse testing or treatment. The use of leftover or banked samples is fundamental to the ability to do research, create reference intervals, and develop new tests, but it creates problems with consent. Advances in genetic testing have created unique ethical issues regarding privacy, incidental findings, and informed consent. As in other professions, the emergence of highly contagious and deadly infectious diseases poses a difficult ethical dilemma of helping patients while protecting healthcare workers.
CONCLUSIONS:Although many clinical laboratorians do not see or treat patients, they must be held accountable to the highest ethical and professional behavior. Recognition and understanding of ethical issues are essential to ethical practice of laboratory medicine.
Effects of One Year of Vitamin D and Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation in Older US Adults [Clinical Immunology]
Observational studies suggest vitamin D and marine -3 fatty acid (n-3 FA) supplements are associated with lower systemic inflammation. However, past trials have been inconsistent.
METHODS:The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) tested vitamin D (2000 IU/day) and/or n-3 FA (1 g/day) supplementation in a 2 x 2 factorial design among women ≥55 and men ≥50 years of age. We assessed changes in interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentrations from baseline to 1 year among participants randomized to vitamin D + n-3 FA (392), vitamin D (392), n-3 FA (392), or placebo only (385). Geometric means and percent changes were compared, adjusting for baseline factors.
RESULTS:Baseline characteristics were well balanced. In the active arms, 25-OH vitamin D rose 39% and n-3 FA rose 55% vs minimal change in placebo arms. Neither supplement reduced biomarkers at 1 year. Vitamin D resulted in 8.2% higher IL-6 (95% CI, 1.5%–15.3%; adjusted P = 0.02), but TNFR2 and hsCRP did not. Among 784 receiving vitamin D, hsCRP increased 35.7% (7.8%–70.9%) in those with low (<20 ng/mL) but not with higher baseline serum 25(OH) vitamin D [0.45% (–8.9% to 10.8%); P interaction = 0.02]. Among 777 randomized to n-3 FA, hsCRP declined [–10.5% (–20.4% to 0.8%)] in those with baseline low (<1.5 servings/week), but not with higher fish intake [6.4% (95% CI, –7.11% to 21.8%); P interaction = 0.06].
CONCLUSIONS:In this large sample from a population-based randomized controlled trial, neither vitamin D nor n-3 FA supplementation over 1 year decreased these biomarkers of inflammation.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01169259; NCT01351805